On March 16, the New York Times finally admitted that the Hunter Biden laptop is authentic. This is a strong signal, since the New York Times is the mouthpiece of the Democrat Party. Even CNN and the Washington Post now concur that the Hunter laptop is authentic.
It seems that the Democrats, and their Deep State overlords, are going to throw Joe Biden under the bus. Will Joe Biden be forced to resign? (as Nixon did in 1974, because of the Watergate scandal)
If that is the case, who will be the replacement? We know that nobody wants Kamala as “president”, not even the DemocRats. So what will happen? Who will be the replacement? Your thoughts?
Let me make a comment, here. This is what I'm thinking: they will get rid of Kamala in some way, then force Joe Biden to resign, and they will enthrone Gavin Newsom the new (Fake) "President".
How about that?
(and this will happen within a couple of months: well before the November mid-terms, so the DemocRats will have a new "face" to show before the mid-terms). By the way: California Governor Gavin Newsom is a Klaus Schwab/WEF darling, just like Justin Trudeau (Canada) and Zelensky (Ukraine). Makes sense?
Please explain how this works. As I understand the succession law & 25th amendment, if "they" get rid of Kamala, a new VP should be nominated and confirmed ala Gerald Ford when Agnew resigned. Yes, it is possible to remove Joe via the 25th but then the VP is next in line. If Kamala's replacement has not been confirmed and the office is vacant, by definition the next in line is Speaker of the House, Senate President pro tem and so on. None of these conspiracy "they will install .. pick one" theories work.
This is what was explained to me by one of my smart subscribers (Pamela Drew, if I remember correctly):
1) the DNC gets rid of Kamala, in some way (dies of Covid, gets assassinated by Mr. Bean, gets poisoned with a ricin banana, whatever)
2) Joe Biden nominates a new VP (under DNC orders - let's suppose it's Gavin Newsom)
3) new VP gets confirmed by Congress.
4) the Hunter laptop scandal explodes, and Joe Biden is forced to resign (the Dems withdraw support, NYT articles and CNN smearing Biden, and so on)
5) with Joe Biden out of the way, the new VP (Newsom) becomes the new "president". Klaus Schwab and the WEF rejoice.
I'm not a constitutional expert by any means, nor a legal expert, so I may be wrong. This is just speculation on my part, as suggested to me by my smart subscriber
Plausible but ... if Kamala is out, who breaks inevitable 50-50 Senate vote to confirm someone so outlandish as Newsom? By definition, Nancy is third in line to succeed Joe but does she automatically become defacto VP if that office is vacant? I'm a tad foggy about that scenario.
Easy: I bet Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Mitt Romney, Liz Cheney will vote to confirm Newsom - along with the DemocRats. Lindsey is in bed with Joe Biden, Mitt Romney has a son involved in the loot of Ukraine, Mitch McConnell is in bed with China, Liz Cheney is 100% RINO
Liz doesn't count. She's not a senator with a vote. If he can't do something to trash Trump, Mitt probably will stay with the team. I don't believe either Lindsey or Mitch would confirm a fruitcake like Newsom.
This is all fun fantasizing but unless it gets so bad for Joe that even the NYSlimes or Washcompost just can't ignore it, Dems will sink with him rather than get stuck with Kamala or worse until '24
Apr 4, 2022·edited Apr 4, 2022Liked by Greg Rubini
Article 2, Section 1 (6)…In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the VicePresident, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
Remove Biden and we have Harris. Remove Harris because she’s a blithering idiot and we have the choice of Congress. And right now with a Democrat controlled Congress, that could be horrendous at best.
If this is going to happen, they better act quick. November 2022 elections are looming quickly and it doesn’t look too good for any Democrat at this point.
Thank you for bringing up that article. So they have to find an excuse to eliminate Kamala, first. Something like "oh... Kamala Harris suddenly died of Covid". Or: "Kamala Harris has been assassinated by a White Supremacist" (which will turn out to be the same black DC cop who killed Ashli Babbit)
Biden gets bumped, Harris has a health scare and Buttigieg gets placed. Young, WEF member and is as malleable as putty. He's got that swamp globalist stench wafting in the wind.
Both can be impeached and removed after midterms. Honestly, I sti see the was Hunter's laptop contents as being so watered down and separate from The Big Guy™ thatI think they're trying the limited hangout to insulate Joe and keep on keeping on destroying our country and world.
But, if we get past the cheating margin in November, we could fix a lot. Even many Dems miss Trump at this point (not the crazy leftists, naturally). Heck, even if they ram this replacement process through before midterms, it's still subject to another impeachment. Midterms are everything. I'm just relieved to hear discussions of polls again after a year of acting like elections were a thing of the past. These people are so damned evil, anything's possible.
I think it will happen much sooner than November. And not by impeachment, but with a Nixon-style scenario: "forced to resign". The sign is already on the wall...
My theory: Like you, I think Joe's days are numbered ~ probably until just after the midterms. Kamala will become President, will select her V.P. (with Obama's "help"), they'll get rid of Kamala, and we will have a president fully approved by the globalist elites.
from what I see, Joe Biden will be forced to resign much earlier: in a matter of weeks (2 months at the most). I believe the DNC will get rid of Kamala before forcing Joe Biden to resign - so the DNC will be free to choose both the new "P", both the new VP.
The big issue for the DNC is that Perkins Coie has been decimated by Durham: Sussmann indicted, Marc Elias under criminal investigation, and forced to resign.
It is Perkins Coie who has been calling the shots inside the DNC in the last 20 years - see this article (published on Jan 29): Link: https://gregrubini.substack.com/p/durham-01
It was Perkins Coie who chose Kamala as Biden VP (info in the article)
It would be a whole lot easier if they could get rid of Kamala before Joe goes. And that is what I've been puzzling over ~ whether as VP or President ~ how exactly would they get rid of her. However, based on your article about Perkins Coie, I am assuming if "they" (or other "powers that be") ask the VP to resign, she will just up and do it? Your thoughts? Side note: Perkins Coie can't be that smart if they picked her to begin with...
The timing of any changes has to be well thought out. As bad as Joe's approval rating is, I was figuring they would try limp through the midterms. In part, due to his dementia and irascibility, I don't think our narcissistic President will want to resign. Do you think he is that well managed by Jill, or will he have to be removed via the 25th Amendment. That alone seems like a lot for the Dems to handle/manage/message about before the midterms. Add to that, getting rid of Kamala, and you'll have a whole lot of controversy with a new VP suddenly becoming President. And on top of all that, Joe (and Jill) will want to protect the family, so he'll want to issue a plethora of pardons* (Hunter and other members of the Biden Crime Family, including himself) before leaving office. Are the Dems so sure they can really afford to go through all of the above and potentially rile up the masses before an election? Unless, of course, that doesn't even matter because the fix is in on the midterms...
* The Constitution doesn't expressly prohibit a President from pardoning himself, and regarding family members:
It makes more sense to somehow get rid of KH, then install in the VP slot the person they actually want to elevate to the presidency when Biden has to go...sooner or later. The new VP doesn't have to be Pelosi: "Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress." So Joe will nominate someone, even though he may not actually know he is nominating someone. You know what I mean.
Apr 4, 2022·edited Apr 4, 2022Liked by Greg Rubini
We're screwed. Line of succession is defined in constitution and current law. There is no debating in congress. If Joe goes, we get Kamala. If she goes, we get Nancy. The only way Mayor Pete even gets a whiff of the oval is if FOURTEEN others are offed in some way.
Congress does have a say as reflected in the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. HOWEVER, this is an act of law that can only be changed by new law that has to pass both houses AND be signed by sitting president. Whoever that president is is already designated by the current law.
Apr 5, 2022·edited Apr 5, 2022Liked by Greg Rubini
You are forgetting about the Spiro Agnew saga: VP Agnew had to resign. Nixon nominated Ford for his new VP. Senate confirmed Ford as VP. Nixon had to resign. Ford became President. Had Nixon died before Ford was confirmed, the Speaker of the House would have become President.
100% correct. That was all done after 25th amendment came along. The interesting aspect, for me at least, of this discussion is going alone with the theory that Kamala has already somehow been dumped, how do we get a new VP if the Senate confirmation vote is 50-50 and there is no sitting VP to break the tie.
I can think of a few RINOs who would say a President has the right to choose their own VP (or a Supreme Court Justice), e.g. Collins, Romney and Murkowski.
I am of the opinion that nominations to the COURTS should be primarily judged by the legal qualifications of the nominee and Senators should vote accordingly, even accepting a nominee of the opposite political persuasion. As a right leaning political independent, I would no more like a 9-0 conservative Supreme Court than I would a 9-0 liberal one. Diversity of opinion is a good thing. Having said that, I thank all the gods that Mitch stood up to block Garland. There does come a point where personal politics is a Supreme disqualifier, as he has shown as Atty Gen.
In the scenarios we are discussing where both prez and VP are POLITICAL offices by definition, politics is the prime consideration and objectionable political viewpoints are fair game.
Greg, Is there Intel available yet on the viability of NATO high ranking military in Mariupol. With so much speculation on suicidal rescue efforts it seems more than likely, but unwise to speculate and join the disinformation gossip.
good question, Jms. I'm reading Russia Today and Sputnik almost daily, to have the "other side of the story" - given the 100% propaganda from US and British sources. The Russians claim that hundreds of British SAS and US Delta Force are on the ground in Ukraine since February (and still there). Plus thousands of mercenaries from other NATO countries. Thus, certainly there are also high ranking NATO officers to lead and instruct them. I think the Russian info can be considered reliable on that.
And we have proof that US Army Gen. Roger L. Cloutier was in Ukraine in July 2021.
How about this to stir the pot? Kamala is dumped and another nebbish is confirmed as VP. Joe gets dumped, Nebbish steps up to Prez and nominates non-entity for VP. Result is two un-elected ciphers sitting at head of the table. Possibly two who had previously tried for prez and failed miserably, not un-like Kamala.
Apr 5, 2022·edited Apr 5, 2022Liked by Greg Rubini
I'm wondering if Biden will "kick the bucket" before he is out of the Whitehouse. If so, do you think they will keep him on ice and say he's in a coma? They could then have Harris stand in as President until Biden recovers. They could run this scenario until the 2024 election.
It seems there is a recent, very concerted effort to oust Biden. But, his handlers know the people can't stand Kamala either. So, they will somehow make her resign as well? I don't know. Biden was pushed on us via fraudulent election and KH was part of the package. Is there a way they can just install someone else? Like Hillary? Of course they know Americans will not accept Pelosi who is second in command. Who will it be?
yes, this is what we are discussing here in this Thread. If you read the different comments and replies, we have different theories floating around. We are exploring the possible scenarios.
I don’t think The Biden family will go “silently away into the night “… unless they get full pardons for all involved and serious financial package {]
This is what I estimate is happening behind the scenes with Jill Biden as lead negotiator
At the same time the Dems are deciding on the next VP which will , unless Kamala surprises all and becomes a great President[ …] , become the next Democratic contender for the 2024 presidential elections [ Michelle ?stacy?pete Buttigieg ?…Hillary ?..]
I doubt Joe Biden and Hunter can give themselves a pardon. That would be untenable, given that the NYT, WaPo (and even CNN!) are throwing them under the bus. We do not yet realize how huge the scandal will develop. Watergate was a drop in an ocean, in comparison.
I do not exclude that in that mess the Joe Biden admission of Oct 24, 2020 will come out: “We have put together the most extensive and inclusive Voter Fraud organization in the history of American politics”
I think "they" have already demonstrated they can govern (however poorly) with the sock-puppet in the WH. They won't get rid of him yet. they will sequester him even more on the basis of weakness, long covid, chronic fatique or whatever. they will claim he is weak but fully functional mentally. they must be worried as Nancy will likely not be speaker after Nov and a Republican will. OR, Kamala resigns soon, biden appoints a new VP (hillary?) and then biden resigns. the shitshow continues.
I STRONGLY believe the deep staters are doing what they know either Russia or China may be about to do and that is slow rolling the dirt on the Biden's grift and influence peddling overseas. They know the Biden's are compromised and it is being used as leverage to keep us from intervening in Ukraine in a more meaningful way. They are slow rolling the acknowledgement of wrong doing to build the case to get rid of him while taking away some of the leverage Russia and China have over him. I think we are going to learn a LOT more about what the Biden's were doing over the next few months and it is going to come out in dribbles, unless Russia and China decide to do a major data dump and really set off a shitstorm.
I say keep 10% in power . He has so much more to cough up . I would not let him or Harris to resign. Until we get things under control . These 2 fools are a treasure if information . If they resign to much will be buried along with them . They need to stay were they are . For know till mid terms . I want to see impeachments. This is were all of the crap will come out if we can get rid of some rhinos .
What I ,as a spectator don’t understand is the role of the WH Physician ..IF indeed Biden is seriously cognitively impaired shouldn’t the WH physician be duty bound to inform the American public ? I assume that’s what he would do concerning any other disease that might hinder the capacity of the President to fulfill his job to the fullest….
If he does not intervene then we need to assume that Biden is “cognitively certified “ by the WH doctor ..and there’s “nothing to worry about “…
What are any of the staff at the WH or any of the 3 letter agencies supposed to be doing? We know what they are supposed to do, but they are doing the opposite.
I’m thinking Kamel is replaced soon. I’ve been guessing by an Obama - either one “grudgingly, but for the good of the country”. Then Biden steps down for medical reasons (they’ve been setting this up for 3-4 months by allowing him to speak in public - showing his senility.). I’m not sure how they get rid of Kamel - I hope not a false flag attack - I thought they were allowing rumors that Joe doesn’t like her so that he could just fire her? But that doesn’t seem to be the narrative holding now.
It must happen soon - they are fixin to get shellacked in the midterms. (I said end of April, I’m not sure I’m gonna win that bet.). There’s still a possibility of shenanigans around another lockdown and mail-in votes also I think - I’m not sure if the Obamas can save the midterms…
I guess they “could” allow Kamel with an Obama VP that then took over somehow after that?
It'll be Michelle vs Hillary, and we should continually support the underdog in this uber-skank death match until they destroy each other's factions through attrition!
Well, without looking, I'm not really sure of the "line of succession" to the Presidency. But, I do know it goes to the VP - Speaker - and then I read where it would go, currently, to Chuck Grassley. Anyway, I can't see Harris or Pelosi getting it due to ENORMOUS amounts of money laundering! My point is, unless the Dems try something with Hillary (she would not make it either, obviously), could it be Grassley?
Let me make a comment, here. This is what I'm thinking: they will get rid of Kamala in some way, then force Joe Biden to resign, and they will enthrone Gavin Newsom the new (Fake) "President".
How about that?
(and this will happen within a couple of months: well before the November mid-terms, so the DemocRats will have a new "face" to show before the mid-terms). By the way: California Governor Gavin Newsom is a Klaus Schwab/WEF darling, just like Justin Trudeau (Canada) and Zelensky (Ukraine). Makes sense?
Please explain how this works. As I understand the succession law & 25th amendment, if "they" get rid of Kamala, a new VP should be nominated and confirmed ala Gerald Ford when Agnew resigned. Yes, it is possible to remove Joe via the 25th but then the VP is next in line. If Kamala's replacement has not been confirmed and the office is vacant, by definition the next in line is Speaker of the House, Senate President pro tem and so on. None of these conspiracy "they will install .. pick one" theories work.
This is what was explained to me by one of my smart subscribers (Pamela Drew, if I remember correctly):
1) the DNC gets rid of Kamala, in some way (dies of Covid, gets assassinated by Mr. Bean, gets poisoned with a ricin banana, whatever)
2) Joe Biden nominates a new VP (under DNC orders - let's suppose it's Gavin Newsom)
3) new VP gets confirmed by Congress.
4) the Hunter laptop scandal explodes, and Joe Biden is forced to resign (the Dems withdraw support, NYT articles and CNN smearing Biden, and so on)
5) with Joe Biden out of the way, the new VP (Newsom) becomes the new "president". Klaus Schwab and the WEF rejoice.
I'm not a constitutional expert by any means, nor a legal expert, so I may be wrong. This is just speculation on my part, as suggested to me by my smart subscriber
Plausible but ... if Kamala is out, who breaks inevitable 50-50 Senate vote to confirm someone so outlandish as Newsom? By definition, Nancy is third in line to succeed Joe but does she automatically become defacto VP if that office is vacant? I'm a tad foggy about that scenario.
Easy: I bet Lindsey Graham, Mitch McConnell, Mitt Romney, Liz Cheney will vote to confirm Newsom - along with the DemocRats. Lindsey is in bed with Joe Biden, Mitt Romney has a son involved in the loot of Ukraine, Mitch McConnell is in bed with China, Liz Cheney is 100% RINO
Liz doesn't count. She's not a senator with a vote. If he can't do something to trash Trump, Mitt probably will stay with the team. I don't believe either Lindsey or Mitch would confirm a fruitcake like Newsom.
This is all fun fantasizing but unless it gets so bad for Joe that even the NYSlimes or Washcompost just can't ignore it, Dems will sink with him rather than get stuck with Kamala or worse until '24
And Liz is in bed with EVERYBODY.
But Newsom is a straight white male...
Yes . But he a idiot . Not sure what to make of the conversation Democrats have no one to lead at this point or never really had .
Well why not polosie. Newsom no one likes him . I rather have maxim watters then . Or shifty mudskipper . What would be the differance.
Picking between Biden, Harris and Pelosi (or even Buttigieg) is like choosing between contracting herpes, syphilis, HPV and the Clap.
you're absolutely right, Jeffrey!!
Article 2, Section 1 (6)…In Case of the Removal of the President from Office, or of his Death, Resignation, or Inability to discharge the Powers and Duties of the said Office, the Same shall devolve on the VicePresident, and the Congress may by Law provide for the Case of Removal, Death, Resignation or Inability, both of the President and Vice President, declaring what Officer shall then act as President, and such Officer shall act accordingly, until the Disability be removed, or a President shall be elected.
Remove Biden and we have Harris. Remove Harris because she’s a blithering idiot and we have the choice of Congress. And right now with a Democrat controlled Congress, that could be horrendous at best.
If this is going to happen, they better act quick. November 2022 elections are looming quickly and it doesn’t look too good for any Democrat at this point.
Thank you for bringing up that article. So they have to find an excuse to eliminate Kamala, first. Something like "oh... Kamala Harris suddenly died of Covid". Or: "Kamala Harris has been assassinated by a White Supremacist" (which will turn out to be the same black DC cop who killed Ashli Babbit)
Read that again, it states clearly, Congress can remove both and appoint a President. I'm thinking positive here, think post mid terms.
No way they allow it to wait til midterms…
Biden gets bumped, Harris has a health scare and Buttigieg gets placed. Young, WEF member and is as malleable as putty. He's got that swamp globalist stench wafting in the wind.
Soon we will see who has been pulling the strings. Pelosi will be stepping down.
Crazy Nanzy will go down with Joe Biden. Like Biden, also Nanzy has a son involved in an Ukrainian energy company (Paul Pelosi >> Viscoil, IIRC)
Plus, that witch is 897 years old.
The cackling camel is impeachment insurance. Im not sure If I have ever seen a more misplaced career. Hate to say it, may be stuck with Joe
not necessarily... ;-)
Both can be impeached and removed after midterms. Honestly, I sti see the was Hunter's laptop contents as being so watered down and separate from The Big Guy™ thatI think they're trying the limited hangout to insulate Joe and keep on keeping on destroying our country and world.
But, if we get past the cheating margin in November, we could fix a lot. Even many Dems miss Trump at this point (not the crazy leftists, naturally). Heck, even if they ram this replacement process through before midterms, it's still subject to another impeachment. Midterms are everything. I'm just relieved to hear discussions of polls again after a year of acting like elections were a thing of the past. These people are so damned evil, anything's possible.
I think it will happen much sooner than November. And not by impeachment, but with a Nixon-style scenario: "forced to resign". The sign is already on the wall...
My theory: Like you, I think Joe's days are numbered ~ probably until just after the midterms. Kamala will become President, will select her V.P. (with Obama's "help"), they'll get rid of Kamala, and we will have a president fully approved by the globalist elites.
from what I see, Joe Biden will be forced to resign much earlier: in a matter of weeks (2 months at the most). I believe the DNC will get rid of Kamala before forcing Joe Biden to resign - so the DNC will be free to choose both the new "P", both the new VP.
The big issue for the DNC is that Perkins Coie has been decimated by Durham: Sussmann indicted, Marc Elias under criminal investigation, and forced to resign.
It is Perkins Coie who has been calling the shots inside the DNC in the last 20 years - see this article (published on Jan 29): Link: https://gregrubini.substack.com/p/durham-01
It was Perkins Coie who chose Kamala as Biden VP (info in the article)
It would be a whole lot easier if they could get rid of Kamala before Joe goes. And that is what I've been puzzling over ~ whether as VP or President ~ how exactly would they get rid of her. However, based on your article about Perkins Coie, I am assuming if "they" (or other "powers that be") ask the VP to resign, she will just up and do it? Your thoughts? Side note: Perkins Coie can't be that smart if they picked her to begin with...
The timing of any changes has to be well thought out. As bad as Joe's approval rating is, I was figuring they would try limp through the midterms. In part, due to his dementia and irascibility, I don't think our narcissistic President will want to resign. Do you think he is that well managed by Jill, or will he have to be removed via the 25th Amendment. That alone seems like a lot for the Dems to handle/manage/message about before the midterms. Add to that, getting rid of Kamala, and you'll have a whole lot of controversy with a new VP suddenly becoming President. And on top of all that, Joe (and Jill) will want to protect the family, so he'll want to issue a plethora of pardons* (Hunter and other members of the Biden Crime Family, including himself) before leaving office. Are the Dems so sure they can really afford to go through all of the above and potentially rile up the masses before an election? Unless, of course, that doesn't even matter because the fix is in on the midterms...
* The Constitution doesn't expressly prohibit a President from pardoning himself, and regarding family members:
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/could-trump-pardon-family-members-if-they-haven-t-been-n1249707
Killary probably has some ideas about how to get rid of KH.
no doubt!
It makes more sense to somehow get rid of KH, then install in the VP slot the person they actually want to elevate to the presidency when Biden has to go...sooner or later. The new VP doesn't have to be Pelosi: "Whenever there is a vacancy in the office of the Vice President, the President shall nominate a Vice President who shall take office upon confirmation by a majority vote of both Houses of Congress." So Joe will nominate someone, even though he may not actually know he is nominating someone. You know what I mean.
We're screwed. Line of succession is defined in constitution and current law. There is no debating in congress. If Joe goes, we get Kamala. If she goes, we get Nancy. The only way Mayor Pete even gets a whiff of the oval is if FOURTEEN others are offed in some way.
Congress does have a say as reflected in the Presidential Succession Act of 1947. HOWEVER, this is an act of law that can only be changed by new law that has to pass both houses AND be signed by sitting president. Whoever that president is is already designated by the current law.
You are forgetting about the Spiro Agnew saga: VP Agnew had to resign. Nixon nominated Ford for his new VP. Senate confirmed Ford as VP. Nixon had to resign. Ford became President. Had Nixon died before Ford was confirmed, the Speaker of the House would have become President.
That's the scenario the Dems are preparing, I think
100% correct. That was all done after 25th amendment came along. The interesting aspect, for me at least, of this discussion is going alone with the theory that Kamala has already somehow been dumped, how do we get a new VP if the Senate confirmation vote is 50-50 and there is no sitting VP to break the tie.
I can think of a few RINOs who would say a President has the right to choose their own VP (or a Supreme Court Justice), e.g. Collins, Romney and Murkowski.
yep
I am of the opinion that nominations to the COURTS should be primarily judged by the legal qualifications of the nominee and Senators should vote accordingly, even accepting a nominee of the opposite political persuasion. As a right leaning political independent, I would no more like a 9-0 conservative Supreme Court than I would a 9-0 liberal one. Diversity of opinion is a good thing. Having said that, I thank all the gods that Mitch stood up to block Garland. There does come a point where personal politics is a Supreme disqualifier, as he has shown as Atty Gen.
In the scenarios we are discussing where both prez and VP are POLITICAL offices by definition, politics is the prime consideration and objectionable political viewpoints are fair game.
Greg, Is there Intel available yet on the viability of NATO high ranking military in Mariupol. With so much speculation on suicidal rescue efforts it seems more than likely, but unwise to speculate and join the disinformation gossip.
good question, Jms. I'm reading Russia Today and Sputnik almost daily, to have the "other side of the story" - given the 100% propaganda from US and British sources. The Russians claim that hundreds of British SAS and US Delta Force are on the ground in Ukraine since February (and still there). Plus thousands of mercenaries from other NATO countries. Thus, certainly there are also high ranking NATO officers to lead and instruct them. I think the Russian info can be considered reliable on that.
And we have proof that US Army Gen. Roger L. Cloutier was in Ukraine in July 2021.
How about this to stir the pot? Kamala is dumped and another nebbish is confirmed as VP. Joe gets dumped, Nebbish steps up to Prez and nominates non-entity for VP. Result is two un-elected ciphers sitting at head of the table. Possibly two who had previously tried for prez and failed miserably, not un-like Kamala.
exactly, Jal. This is the scenario we are thinking about
I'm wondering if Biden will "kick the bucket" before he is out of the Whitehouse. If so, do you think they will keep him on ice and say he's in a coma? They could then have Harris stand in as President until Biden recovers. They could run this scenario until the 2024 election.
could be. But they need to get rid of Kamala, first.
The Dems overlords do not want Kamala as P
It seems there is a recent, very concerted effort to oust Biden. But, his handlers know the people can't stand Kamala either. So, they will somehow make her resign as well? I don't know. Biden was pushed on us via fraudulent election and KH was part of the package. Is there a way they can just install someone else? Like Hillary? Of course they know Americans will not accept Pelosi who is second in command. Who will it be?
yes, this is what we are discussing here in this Thread. If you read the different comments and replies, we have different theories floating around. We are exploring the possible scenarios.
This is why the Republicans have to take back the House and Senate in November. Then we'll see what they will do with Biden/Harris/Pelosi.
I don’t think The Biden family will go “silently away into the night “… unless they get full pardons for all involved and serious financial package {]
This is what I estimate is happening behind the scenes with Jill Biden as lead negotiator
At the same time the Dems are deciding on the next VP which will , unless Kamala surprises all and becomes a great President[ …] , become the next Democratic contender for the 2024 presidential elections [ Michelle ?stacy?pete Buttigieg ?…Hillary ?..]
I doubt Joe Biden and Hunter can give themselves a pardon. That would be untenable, given that the NYT, WaPo (and even CNN!) are throwing them under the bus. We do not yet realize how huge the scandal will develop. Watergate was a drop in an ocean, in comparison.
I do not exclude that in that mess the Joe Biden admission of Oct 24, 2020 will come out: “We have put together the most extensive and inclusive Voter Fraud organization in the history of American politics”
Thanks Greg. Read Bioclandestine today.
I believe they will choose big Mike!
oh my... don't even say that, Gongulent!!
Sorry I couldn’t resist! Lol
LOL... I imagined that... I hope I will not have bad nightmares tonight in my sleep, because of that!!
I think "they" have already demonstrated they can govern (however poorly) with the sock-puppet in the WH. They won't get rid of him yet. they will sequester him even more on the basis of weakness, long covid, chronic fatique or whatever. they will claim he is weak but fully functional mentally. they must be worried as Nancy will likely not be speaker after Nov and a Republican will. OR, Kamala resigns soon, biden appoints a new VP (hillary?) and then biden resigns. the shitshow continues.
I STRONGLY believe the deep staters are doing what they know either Russia or China may be about to do and that is slow rolling the dirt on the Biden's grift and influence peddling overseas. They know the Biden's are compromised and it is being used as leverage to keep us from intervening in Ukraine in a more meaningful way. They are slow rolling the acknowledgement of wrong doing to build the case to get rid of him while taking away some of the leverage Russia and China have over him. I think we are going to learn a LOT more about what the Biden's were doing over the next few months and it is going to come out in dribbles, unless Russia and China decide to do a major data dump and really set off a shitstorm.
I say keep 10% in power . He has so much more to cough up . I would not let him or Harris to resign. Until we get things under control . These 2 fools are a treasure if information . If they resign to much will be buried along with them . They need to stay were they are . For know till mid terms . I want to see impeachments. This is were all of the crap will come out if we can get rid of some rhinos .
What I ,as a spectator don’t understand is the role of the WH Physician ..IF indeed Biden is seriously cognitively impaired shouldn’t the WH physician be duty bound to inform the American public ? I assume that’s what he would do concerning any other disease that might hinder the capacity of the President to fulfill his job to the fullest….
If he does not intervene then we need to assume that Biden is “cognitively certified “ by the WH doctor ..and there’s “nothing to worry about “…
you are assuming we still have a "Constitutional Republic"... and not a totally corrupt Fascist-Communist regime
Please, don't mix Communists in. We have nothing to do with the current shit show.
What are any of the staff at the WH or any of the 3 letter agencies supposed to be doing? We know what they are supposed to do, but they are doing the opposite.
I’m thinking Kamel is replaced soon. I’ve been guessing by an Obama - either one “grudgingly, but for the good of the country”. Then Biden steps down for medical reasons (they’ve been setting this up for 3-4 months by allowing him to speak in public - showing his senility.). I’m not sure how they get rid of Kamel - I hope not a false flag attack - I thought they were allowing rumors that Joe doesn’t like her so that he could just fire her? But that doesn’t seem to be the narrative holding now.
It must happen soon - they are fixin to get shellacked in the midterms. (I said end of April, I’m not sure I’m gonna win that bet.). There’s still a possibility of shenanigans around another lockdown and mail-in votes also I think - I’m not sure if the Obamas can save the midterms…
I guess they “could” allow Kamel with an Obama VP that then took over somehow after that?
It'll be Michelle vs Hillary, and we should continually support the underdog in this uber-skank death match until they destroy each other's factions through attrition!
Well, without looking, I'm not really sure of the "line of succession" to the Presidency. But, I do know it goes to the VP - Speaker - and then I read where it would go, currently, to Chuck Grassley. Anyway, I can't see Harris or Pelosi getting it due to ENORMOUS amounts of money laundering! My point is, unless the Dems try something with Hillary (she would not make it either, obviously), could it be Grassley?
Thanks. Kiev and Nuland sends them word for their hot tub--"Die or surrender"
Killary.
Killery
that witch is now what? 437 years old?
No, I don't think the DNC replacement will be HRC
How about Michelle Obama vs Donald Trump, something please come and save us from ourselves.