Greg Rubini Investigations

Share this post

Durham Indictments: Perkins Coie, the law firm of the DNC

gregrubini.substack.com
Durham Investigation

Durham Indictments: Perkins Coie, the law firm of the DNC

The indictments of Michael Sussmann and Igor Danchenko: the implications and consequences

Jan 29, 2022
10
4
Share

For one full year, from September 2020 to August 2021, we had not heard a peep from John Durham.

Then, all of a sudden, on September 16, 2021, Special Prosecutor John Durham filed the indictment of a certain Michael Sussmann.
And forty days later, on November 3, Durham filed the indictment of a guy named Igor Danchenko.

What can we gather from these two indictments?

First, this means that the Durham Criminal Investigation is not dead.
And this is good news.

It is evidence that the Durham Criminal Investigation has been ongoing, quietly, behind the scenes, for all these months.

But there is much more which can be gathered, from these two indictments.

These are “Speaking Indictments”, not standard indictments.
What does it mean?

Usually, when a Prosecutor files an indictment, the document is 2 or 3 pages long. In the case of the indictments of Sussmann and Igor Danchenko, instead, the indictments are 27 and 39 pages long.
Way over the top.
The indictments are very detailed and thorough, and they 'paint a picture', they 'tell what happened' in detail. This is why, in legal lingo, they are called “Speaking Indictments”.

Let us see the official documents from the Department of Justice.

Official press release of the Department of Justice, regarding the Indictment of Michael Sussmann:
“Grand Jury indicts DC Attorney with making false statements to the FBI in 2016 regarding alleged communications between Trump Organization and Russian Bank” - Link:
https://www.justice.gov/sco/pr/grand-jury-indicts-dc-attorney-making-false-statements-fbi-2016-regarding-alleged

Indictment of Michael Sussmann - Department of Justice:
https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-release/file/1433511/download


Official press release of the Department of Justice, regarding the Indictment of Igor Danchenko: “Russian National indicted for making false statements to the FBI”
https://www.justice.gov/sco/pr/russian-national-indicted-making-false-statements-fbi

Indictment of Igor Danchenko - Department of Justice - Link:
https://www.justice.gov/sco/press-release/file/1446386/download

I encourage the reader to examine both indictments,
and the DOJ press releases.


Is there something significant in these two indictments?

Yes, there is.
Michael Sussmann was the General Counsel of Hillary Clinton, during the 2016 Presidential campaign, and the General Counsel for the DNC (the 'Democratic National Committee', which is the governing body of the Democratic Party).

Michael Sussmann is not a small fish. Sussmann is one of the two main lawyers of the law firm Perkins Coie, together with Marc Elias.
And both Marc Elias and Michael Sussmann are up to their necks in the orchestration of the 2020 Election Fraud.

Interesting, isn't it?


Perkins Coie and the DNC

But what exactly is Perkins Coie, and why it is so important, in relation to the indictment of Michael Sussmann?

Perkins Coie is a gigantic law firm, with more than 1200 attorneys, and 20 offices all around the world, even in Communist China (!).

Perkins Coie is the main law firm and the counsel of record for the Democratic Party, and for:

  • the Democratic National Committee

  • the Democratic Leadership Council

  • the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee

  • the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee


Yes, you heard that well.
This means that all the Senators of the Democrat Party, and all the House Congressmen of the Democrat Party are represented, for legal matters, by Perkins Coie.

In other words, Perkins Coie are the puppeteers of the Democrat Party.
They control the party hook, line and sinker.

And Marc Elias and Michael Sussmann are the top lawyers of Perkins Coie.
Marc Elias and Sussmann are the master puppeteers of the Democrat Party.

But Perkins Coie doesn't represent just the Democrat Party Senators and House members.
Oh no!

Guess who else has been represented by Perkins Coie:

  • The Presidential Campaign of Hillary Clinton in 2016

  • The Presidential Campaigns of Barack Obama in 2008 and in 2012

  • The Presidential Campaign of John Kerry in 2004

  • The Presidential Campaign of Kamala Harris in 2020

Now you understand the importance and the real power of Perkins Coie, and the key role this law firm plays in US politics.


Perkins Coie and Kamala Harris

Who do you think chose Kamala as VP?

“Kamala Harris picks Perkins Coie as firm ramps up work for Democrats”
Source: Law.com, July 16, 2019:
https://www.law.com/nationallawjournal/2019/07/16/kamala-harris-picks-perkins-coie-as-firm-ramps-up-work-for-democrats/

The title of the article should be read in reverse:
“Perkins Coie picks Kamala Harris as VP”

By the way: Perkins Coie represented also Elizabeth Warren in the Presidential primaries. This means that Elizabeth Warren was Perkins Coie "Plan B" as VP.

Or perhaps Elizabeth Warren was originally their "Plan A", then for some reason, or because of some mistake that Warren made, Perkins Coie and the Deep State switched to "Plan B": Kamala.

To be continued, in Part 2 (in the coming days)
You can write your comments or questions below, in the Q&A Session


More about the Durham Indictments of Michael Sussmann, Igor Danchenko, and about Marc Elias and Perkins Coie in the book “Durham Indictments” - 2nd Edition - by Greg Rubini:

Published on December 22, 2021
Link to the book:
https://gregrubini.squarespace.com/bookstore/p/durham

You can find the other books written by Greg Rubini at the “Greg Rubini Bookstore”
Link: https://gregrubini.squarespace.com/books

In case you don’t know who is Greg Rubini, you can read “About the Author”
Link: https://gregrubini.squarespace.com/about

This post is public, so feel free to share it on Twitter and Facebook

Share

“Greg Rubini Investigations” is a reader-supported publication. If you liked this article and you want to support my work, consider upgrading to a paid subscription

10
4
Share
4 Comments
Techno Fog
Writes The Reactionary
Jan 30, 2022Liked by Greg Rubini

Welcome back 🙏

Expand full comment
Reply
1 reply by Greg Rubini
Silvercat
Jan 30, 2022Liked by Greg Rubini

Durham did a great job unraveling their shell game. Wonder if he followed the money also. Corresponding special deposits in Sussman's bank accounts also? Check Cook Island and Belize.

Expand full comment
Reply
2 more comments…
Top
New
Community

No posts

Ready for more?

© 2023 Greg Rubini
Privacy ∙ Terms ∙ Collection notice
Start WritingGet the app
Substack is the home for great writing